Professional Researcher's Encyclopaedia

Knowledge is only a click away

Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin - enyclopaedia article

Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin

Summary: Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin (2001) was decided by the United States 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (Alabama, Florida, and Georgia) against the owner of Gone With the Wind, vacating an injunction prohibiting the publisher of The Wind Done Gone from distributing the book. This case stands for the principle that the creation and publication of a carefully-written parody novel in the United States counts as fair use. As such, it upholds the previous supreme court decision in ...

read the full Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin article

Buy Suntrust v Houghton Mifflin related products:


Buy from Amazon.co.uk Books - Music - Classical - VHS - DVD - Video-games - Software - Electronics - Toys
Buy from Amazon.com Books - Music - Classical - VHS - DVD - Videogames - Software - Electronics - Photo - Toys
Buy from Amazon.ca Books - Music - Classical - VHS - DVD - Video-games - Software - Livres en Français
Buy from Amazon.de - - - - - - -
Buy from Amazon.fr - - - - -
Advanced Product Search (new):    uk    |     us    |     ca    |     de    |     fr

Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin

     From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin (2001) was decided by the United States 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (Alabama, Florida, and Georgia) against the owner of Gone With the Wind, vacating an injunction prohibiting the publisher of The Wind Done Gone from distributing the book. This case stands for the principle that the creation and publication of a carefully-written parody novel in the United States counts as fair use. As such, it upholds the previous supreme court decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music which ruled that 2 Live Crew's unlicensed use of the bass line from Roy Orbison's song "Oh, Pretty Woman" constituted fair use under copyright law and extends that principle from songs to novels and is binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit.

The reasoning of the case is also significant as it is the first time an federal appellate court in the United States has invoked the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as a basis for the protection of fair use.

External links

link to this article with the following HTML

 
This article is from Wikipedia. This article was up-to-date as of 8 May 2004 - See live article
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

This page is part of Professional Researcher
Web site design by Dean Marshall